Thursday, November 12, 2009

Tate’s New Leader

A new director has been appointed for Tate Britain in London.

From the Guardian:

Penelope Curtis, currently curator of the Henry Moore Institute in Leeds, has been appointed director of Tate Britain.

(…)

What will her challenges be?

Well, since the bifurcation of the Tate Gallery into Tates Modern and Britain, the former has increasingly become the hip one with the massive visitor numbers, while Tate Britain has been emptier and less obviously fashionable. The contrast is set to become more extreme if and when Tate Modern gets its huge new extension. Curtis will have to work out how to make Tate Britain not look like a poor relation. There is, perhaps, also an intellectual argument to work through – what does it mean to have a national museum of British art? Is it limiting or reductive to see visual art in national terms? What does “national” mean in a post-devolution age? How should Tate Britain relate to the National Gallery?

The Turner prize is regularly the annual exhibition that pulls in the publicity and the crowds to Tate Britain – but there are noises about its moving around the country to the new “cultural capitals” that Andy Burnham and Ben Bradshaw, as successive culture secretaries, have been trying to instigate. Does that weaken the hand of Tate Britain to an unacceptable degree?

Curtis will assume her new role at a difficult time for all major museums. The recession, the decline in value of the pound, the spike on utilities costs, the difficulties of finding sponsorship and of fundraising, and political uncertainty, with public-spending cuts in the offing, could mean Curtis having to make tough and unpleasant decisions early into her stint as director.

Finally, for any director of a Tate museum, there is the relationship with the overlord, Sir Nicholas Serota, to negotiate. Curtis will never be wholly autonomous.

One reason to celebrate – Tate has finally appointed a woman to a directorship. While Susan Daniel-McElroy was director of Tate St Ives from 2000-2007, and Andrea Nixon is currently in charge of operations as executive director of Tate Liverpool, Tate’s most senior personnel have been too long male dominated – notwthstanding the talents of such senior curators in the ranks as Frances Morris and Sheena Wagstaff.

Not that the Tate has been any worse than anyone else. The National Museums Directors Conference has 28 members, only six of whom are women. Though the middle ranks of museums are often dominated by talented women, there are few who make it right to the top…

Click here to read the article

Posted by KateAlexander01 in 18:43:06 | Permalink | No Comments »

Wednesday, October 28, 2009

Chief Curator Position Qualifications

When preparing for a career in the arts – especially if you have a specific profession or position in mind – job listings can be used as a sort of road map to guide your pursuit.

For example, let’s say your dream is to be the chief curator of a museum, collection, or art institution. The American Association of Museums provides a Job HQ service for it’s members, but the listings may be searched by anyone online.

If you enter “curator”  in the keyword search on their site, a list of all relevant positions will appear. When I searched, one of the the available positions for a chief curator listed the following requirements:

The qualified candidate will have at least 5 years experience as a curator or senior curator with strong national and international relationships in the field. He/She should have previous museum experience organizing international exhibitions, travelling and scheduling exhibitions, and building collections as well as managing corresponding publications.  The candidate must have experience working directly with artists on new works and specific projects.  He/She will have previous experience managing a department and working with a diverse staff, Trustees donors, collectors and governance structures.  The ideal candidate must possess strong public speaking and interpersonal skills and a passion for educating and engaging a growing audience, including the ability to communicate well with lay audiences as well as artists, curators, trustees, and funders.  And the Chief Curator must bring an artistic curiosity and vision for the role of art, artists and museums in contemporary society.

This is, of course, just one example. I suggest reading various job descriptions every few months or so. You can be as specific as you want in your searches, but the more you know the better you’ll understand what is expected and you can prepare accordingly!

Posted by KateAlexander01 in 21:58:54 | Permalink | No Comments »

Tuesday, October 6, 2009

Bad News for Museum Directors

This month, The Art Newspaper published a detailed report on the impact of the current US economy on museum directors and the salaries they receive.

From The Art Newspaper:

A survey of more than 60 major art museums in the US shows that the directors of more than one third have recently taken pay cuts, many of them substantial, and senior staff at most of those institutions have also had their compensation trimmed. The cuts range from salary reductions and forfeiture of bonuses to unpaid leave.

Even where there have not been massive layoffs, hiring freezes leave posts vacant and incentives induce early retirement. In the past year, New York’s Museum of Modern Art has cut its staff from around 850 to 741 through a hiring freeze and natural attrition.

Pay cuts extend to curators and administrators who have had their salaries frozen, their hours reduced, or their employer contributions to insurance and retirement plans cut. But directors of large institutions are still among the highest paid in the culture sector, with packages ranging from low six figures to more than $1m per year.

Among the directors who have taken the largest cuts are those earning the biggest paycheques at the richest institutions. MoMA director Glenn Lowry, the highest paid chief executive of a US art museum, had his salary reduced 15% last year, but his total compensation still topped $1.32m, and will remain above $1m this year even after another 10% cut. Peter Marzio, the director of the Museum of Fine Arts, Houston, took a voluntary compensation reduction “in excess of 20%”…

Click here to continue reading

Posted by KateAlexander01 in 21:26:47 | Permalink | No Comments »

Thursday, October 1, 2009

When I grow up I want to be an… art dealer

When choosing a career path, you can gain invaluable information from professionals who work or have worked in your field of interest. By asking questions and, most importantly, listening they can provide insight to help you make a decision about pursuing a particular career…or not.

Keep in mind, there is always a chance that what they tell you will not be what you want to hear. It could be that their experience in the field has not been positive, or it might be a red flag that this profession is not well-suited for you. Either way, it is a good idea to talk to more than one person.

Having said that, an article on salary.com presents the perspective of an art dealer, who owns an art gallery in New York City, about his career and the art dealing profession.

The Eye of the Beholder from salary.com:

As long as he can remember, David wanted to work with paintings and drawings. He earned a Ph.D. in art history, but notes that degrees count for little. “The keys to art dealing are quality, rarity, and value. You can only recognize those if you have looked at a lot of things.”

And Ph.D. or not, you start low. “Many people in this field have an independent income and will do anything to get in the door,” he said. “If you are not willing to volunteer, pick another line of work.”

David began as a museum intern and then moved within the museum to answering phones, working in storage, and doing research. The experience convinced him he’d prefer the world of the art dealer, where the first emphasis is on aesthetics, not on historical importance – and where an owner, not a board of trustees, makes acquisition decisions. “A gallery can move much faster because it’s so small. Five full-time employees is a big operation,” he said…

Click here to read the full article

Posted by KateAlexander01 in 20:25:47 | Permalink | No Comments »

Tuesday, September 15, 2009

Busy fall for galleries

As the Fall season of art shows has started up with a fever, I’ve been thinking about the daily lives of artists, gallerists, assistants, preparators, registrars, critics, etc. and how very different things are than just a month ago.  Every Fall I get very excited about the shows happening all over the world, but I must say I am very appreciative of all of the hard work that goes into this crazy art world we love so much.  It’s not like art makes itself (well, not always), or it magically gets installed by little elves, or articles and press releases get written at the snap of a finger… these things take time, and they also take money.  So, hats off to the entire art world for another beautiful Fall season of shows, despite the miserable state of all of our finances.  The shows look beautiful, and here’s hoping that next year we’ll be back on our feet!

Posted by KateAlexander01 in 20:53:35 | Permalink | No Comments »

Thursday, August 20, 2009

When I grow up I want to be… a conservator

The field of fine art conservation and restoration is rapidly growing, partly due to awareness, and partly due to the unstable materials modern and contemporary artists are using more and more.  It is important to note the difference between conservation and restoration.  According to ConservArt Associates, “Many people are confused about the difference between an art conservator and a restorer.  To the layperson there is seemingly no difference and the terms are used interchangeably.  However, this is very much not the case and the gulf between “restoration” and “conservation” is rapidly widening.  Art conservators are generally academically trained to at least the level of a Master’s degree (M.A.C. – Master’s of Art Conservation – see FAQ on Where do I get conservation training?).  They have training in the scientific, art historical and artistic aspects and requirements of works of art.  Fine art conservation is relatively new (only the last 50-60 years, since WWII) whereas restoration has arguably existed since the beginning of the creation of art when artists restored their own or others’ works.  Restorers tend to have been trained as artisans (often apprenticed to artists) or have learned by experience.  This type of learning is a necessary but not sufficient condition to treat works of art in a manner that will reliably ensure their survival.”

Salaries for these jobs tend to start on the low end (but hey, what art-related job doesn’t?), especially during the apprentice or intern time, but there is a lot of room for growth, especially in this ever-expanding field.

Posted by KateAlexander01 in 15:48:53 | Permalink | No Comments »

Saturday, August 8, 2009

MutualArt Open to All

I’m interrupting my “When I Grow Up” segment to share some news with you art enthusiasts out there. One of my favorite art information websites, MutualArt.com, has restructured its subscription service, so now anyone can have access to the website without having a member profile (which is actually free anyway). 

I find MutualArt.com a really helpful resource for staying in the know about the art world–they have comprehensive profiles on thousands of galleries, museums, and artists worldwide, as well as an article database. I have a basic free membership, which means I created a profile about my self based on my art interests–my preferred type of art, artists, which cities I want to “track”–and MutualArt sends me an email once a week or so giving me the scoop on what’s going on in the art world based on my member preferences. And if one wants to go for the premium membership, one really gets the works.

Anyway, since navigating the art world can be an overwhelming pain in the ass, when I find tools that make it a little easier, I like to share them. That’s what bloggers are for :)
Posted by KateAlexander01 in 16:48:35 | Permalink | No Comments »

Monday, August 3, 2009

When I grow up I want to be…a curator

I speak from experience when I say curating is fun. A curator is involved in constructing the mission and tone of permanent collections as well as special exhibitions. For a full article by your’s truly on the details of curating a special exhibition, click here.

When it comes to permanent collections, curators, as experts in the field of art, function as the custodians of the mission of the collection. If the museum is a modern art museum, the curator will of course focus on acquiring works for the collection that exemplify the tenets of modernism to make the collection as strong as possible. Likewise, if a museum is an Asian art museum, the curators try to select works that are representative of art from across a continent–no easy task.

Some works may be acquired from auction sales, but often, since museums are non-profit institutions, curators must build relationships with private collectors and patrons. A curator must thus have strong interpersonal skills, networking abilities and shmoozing capabilities; museum collections benefit largely from gifts and bequests of art work.

The curator will also be involved in the continued maintenance and life of the collection: they may oversee a restoration of a work, or will often decide if a work will be lent out for an exhibition or not.

You don’t have to work at a museum to be a curator: you can also curate private collections, or corporate collections. Wealth does not equal taste: when a person gets rich and seeks to start an art collection, they often need guidance and someone to manage the collection. Art consultants often function as curators of such collections. Corporations have also started their own art collections, often as an investment strategy, and require curators for those as well.

There’s also, of course, curating possibilities in galleries and other smaller non-profit spaces. It is not unusual for galleries in New York, especially emerging artists galleries, to have open calls for guest curators to submit proposals for an exhibition. These curating opportunities don’t often pay much, but they are an opportunity to get some experience, and some beneficial exposure for young, emerging artists. Guest curating, however, is also an available opportunity at many museums: if you have the a good idea that fits their mission, they’ll give you a contract and gallery space.
Posted by KateAlexander01 in 14:52:20 | Permalink | No Comments »

Thursday, July 23, 2009

When I Grow Up I Want to be…a Teacher/Professor

OK, enough already with the depressing news about how there’s no jobs in the arts. Let’s focus on what jobs there are in the arts. Welcome to my new “When I Grow Up…” series, where I will devote several posts to what types of career paths to which you can apply your fine arts or art history background.

Teaching may have a reputation for not providing the biggest salaries, but 1. you’re committing yourself to a life working in the art world–if you haven’t already resigned yourself to meager wages, then you’re in the wrong profession, and 2. the truth is that teaching is always something that is in demand. The art market may be fluttering up and down, but our nation’s schools and universities aren’t going anywhere. Teachers and professors are mostly in steady demand.

I suggest the teaching profession especially to artists because there are many more diverse teaching opportunities available for artists than art historians. Even the rock stars of the art world make their steady income through teaching: the illustrious faculty at the UCLA School of Arts includes Barbara Kruger and Catherine Opie; Yale’s art faculty also includes some power house names, such as Gregory Crewdson and Peter Halley. The list of teaching artists goes on.

For the young artist starting out, a B.A. can land you a teaching position in private schools at the K-12 level (teaching requirements for public school vary from state to state, but usually some higher credentials, such as a masters in education or your relevant field, are required.) If you do have your M.F.A., then your opportunities really open up–the academic world of colleges and universities is your proverbial oyster. It is admittedly competitive to land the tenured professorial position, but adjunct teaching (contracted teaching) is a good place to start.

Art historians are a little more limited, as art history programs are much scarcer in grammar schools, and unless you’re teaching community college, a Ph.D. will be required to teach at the academic level. Adjuncting may be your bread and butter at an early age, but hopefully you can work your way to the tenure track.
Posted by KateAlexander01 in 16:34:15 | Permalink | No Comments »

Monday, July 20, 2009

Controversy and disagreement over stimulus money for the arts

As I wrote in an earlier blog posting, the National Endowment for the Arts is devoting special funds specifically toward the preservation of jobs in the arts.

It is nice to see the positive effect of this stimulus money: in an article in the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, the newspaper reported that the Fulton County Arts Council will use its $250,000 from the NEA grant to help keep 104 non-profit arts organizations afloat. When some small non-profits are coming up $5,000 short in their payroll, the smallest help makes a big difference, said Jan Selman, the executive director of the Arts Leadership League of Georgia.

But there are also critics who believe funding the arts in such hard economic times is a big waste of much needed funds, as the article quoted one disgruntled social worker: 

“This is shockingly irresponsible government. Somebody needs to tell Washington that we’re in a serious recession,” said Kelly McCutchen, executive vice president of the Georgia Public Policy Foundation. “The average Georgia family is worried about paying rent and utility bills and not going to the opera on a Saturday night.”

Ms. McCutchen’s statement unfortunately reflects most people’s opinion of funding the arts during a recession, and it also explains why private giving to the arts is also at an all-time low: if one has to choose between social welfare programs and the arts, they choose the former. It is indeed a delicate and controversial issue, but I believe these critics are taking the arts for granted. What would the world be like without museums, theaters, and non-profit art education centers and spaces? The arts are conceived of as a frivolous luxury–if we want to save jobs in the arts, we’re going to have to change how America views the arts in this country.
Posted by KateAlexander01 in 18:12:47 | Permalink | No Comments »